Minutes of September 10, 2014 meeting of Old Louisville Zoning and Land Use Committee [ZALU]
(Approved for publication on 10.08.14)
Regular monthly public meetings are scheduled on second Wednesday of
each month.
Location: Old Louisville Information Center, Central Park
Called to order at 7:05 PM.
Attending members: Chuck Anderson, ZALU chair; Leah Stewart; Lira
Johnson; Joe Impellizzeri; Bob Bajandas; Christopher White; Stephen Peterson.
Absent members: Erin Lee, Mary Martin
Others in attendance: none
Quorum: √
Summary of actions: Moved/Second/Vote - M/S/V on ZALU August 13 meeting minutes.
Order of Business
I. Minutes from August 13 meeting presented. Motion to accept / seconded
/ approved unanimously with changes.
II. Old Business:
A.
TNZD
revisions. Chuck Anderson reports that he has produced a new document that
interleaves the recommended new language and commercial uses into the current
published uses so listed in the Land Development Code [LDC] Appendix 2
“Traditional Neighborhood Zoning District” [TNZD]. Anderson hopes that this
document will be easier to understand than the original spreadsheet developed
by the TNZD Review Group. Chuck solicited opinions about the document, by
email, from all ZALU members.
Legend for interpreting the document:
- Text highlighted in grey (print document) or yellow (digital file) indicates currently listed uses in Appendix 2
- Text that is
struck through with a lineis no longer allowed in the permitted uses of Appendix 2 - Text that is underlined is a recommended addition to the list of uses in Appendix 2
B. Realtor letter. Christopher suggested that Mary Martin
take on the retooling and improvement of the realtor letter and its
distribution procedure. White will
send out by email, to ZALU members, a mark up of the letter.
C. Old Louisville Neighborhood Council
[OLNC] tabled motion to support Councilwoman Hamilton’s proposed
moratorium and study of rooming
/ transitional housing in her district
. Leah will attend the Sept. OLNC
D.
Legal
and code definitions and permits. Lira reports -
1.
that
parsing the definition of family has proved to be a dead end. Bob asks if the
better tactic would be to change the density regulations in the Property
Maintenance Code and that the word “overcrowding” be substituted for the word
“density” in any brief that Lira prepares from her research.
2.
that she examined the process for issuing a
Certificate of Occupancy [COO] in
several other cities: Lexington KY and Dallas TX. Issues were how much local
control isallowed under KY law and how inexpensive and simple a certification
process could be. Single-family
dwellings controlled locally.
KY law allows for local ordinance to be stricter than
the state code. Can “use” be recorded in COO?
a)
Bob
notes that COO pertains only to construction permits, not to property changing
hands
b)
Discussion
point on terminology: would the term “certificate of use” better serve our
purposes? Language from Dallas
codes examined. Lira will include this point in her brief.
c)
Tangent:
Stephen recounts a Metro PDS planning seminar he attended which discussed new
density numbers for neighborhoods and controls on “Conditional Use
Permit”[CUP].
E. Ongoing property cases
1) 1388 S. 2nd. Review case information. Joseph reports on what is observable vis a vis the meter manifold. White reported on rental listings at the property including a Unit #7 in accessory building.
1) 1388 S. 2nd. Review case information. Joseph reports on what is observable vis a vis the meter manifold. White reported on rental listings at the property including a Unit #7 in accessory building.
2) 944
S. 6th. Stephen reports owner has retained a lawyer to contest the
zoning violation. Other
activity on site suggests that compliance is not happening.
3) 109 W. Ormsby. White reports: case has been referred to district court though no court date
scheduled as of this writing.
4) 1031 S. 6th. Question is raised as to the status of the recent mapping change of the property
proposed to the Metro Planning Commission. More information needed. Discussion deferred.
activity on site suggests that compliance is not happening.
3) 109 W. Ormsby. White reports: case has been referred to district court though no court date
scheduled as of this writing.
4) 1031 S. 6th. Question is raised as to the status of the recent mapping change of the property
proposed to the Metro Planning Commission. More information needed. Discussion deferred.
Adjourned 8:08 p.m.
No comments:
Post a Comment